0.4 C
New York
Monday, January 19, 2026
Home Blog

At least 21 killed as two high-speed trains collide in Spain | Transport News

0

Authorities have deployed mobile intensive care units to the crash site near Adamuz, where 25 people are injured.

At least 21 people have been killed after two high-speed trains collided in southern Spain, authorities say.

Spain’s ADIF rail body said in a post on X that a train travelling on Sunday from coastal Malaga to the capital, Madrid, derailed near Adamuz, crossing onto the other track. It crashed into an oncoming train, which also derailed.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Spain’s Interior Ministry said that at least 21 people were confirmed dead. Andalusia’s emergency services had earlier said that 25 people were “seriously” injured. Five mobile intensive care units, four emergency critical care units and numerous ambulances were deployed to the site of the crash.

The on-site services were focused on stabilising the injured before transferring them to hospitals, Juanma Moreno, president of Andalusia’s regional government, wrote on social media late Sunday.

“Our solidarity and support to all those affected,” he added.

ADIF personnel were also coordinating with emergency services on the ground.

Trains travelling from the Andalusia region to Madrid have been suspended, with services from Cordoba, Sevilla, Malaga and Huelva expected to be unavailable through “at least” Monday, the rail body said.

Salvador Jimenez, a journalist for the state-run broadcaster RTVE, told the digital outlet Informacion that he had been on board the Malaga train.

The train’s last two carriages derailed, he said, with the final carriage turning fully onto its side as it landed on the tracks.

It felt like the train was experiencing an “earthquake” in the moments before the crash, Jimenez said.

EU rushes to prevent Trump’s proposed tariffs on Greenland, readies for potential retaliation

0

EU scrambles to avert Trump Greenland tariffs, prepares retaliation

Danish Prime Minister asserts that Europe will not be blackmailed following Trump’s Greenland threats

0

Reuters Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen speaks at a press conference Reuters

Mette Frederiksen and other European allies are standing in solidarity with Greenland, despite Trump’s threat of tariffs

Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen says “Europe won’t be blackmailed”, as she and other European leaders continue to weigh their response to US President Donald Trump’s tariff threats over Greenland.

Trump says he will impose new taxes on eight US allies – Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the UK – in February if they oppose his proposed takeover of the autonomous Danish territory.

He insists Greenland is critical for US security and has not ruled out taking it by force – a move that has drawn widespread criticism.

The countries threatened with tariffs have now issued joint statement, saying Trump’s plan risks a “dangerous downward spiral”.

“Tariff threats undermine transatlantic relations,” they said, reiterating that they “stand in full solidarity with the Kingdom of Denmark and the people of Greenland”.

The countries stressed they are “committed to strengthening Arctic security as a shared transatlantic interest” as members of the Nato military alliance.

“We stand ready to engage in a dialogue based on the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity that we stand firmly behind,” the statement reads.

Separately, Frederiksen wrote on Facebook: “We want to cooperate and we are not the ones seeking conflict. And I am happy for the consistent messages from the rest of the continent: Europe will not be blackmailed.”

“It is all the more important that we stand firm on the fundamental values that created the European community.”

Meanwhile, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he had had phone calls on Sunday with Frederiksen, as well as European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte, before speaking to Trump.

A spokeswoman for Starmer’s office said he had reiterated his position that Greenland’s security was a priority for all Nato members. “He also said that applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of Nato allies is wrong,” the spokeswoman added.

Trump has threatened to impose a 10% tariff on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands and Finland, which would come into force on 1 February, but could later rise to 25% – and would last until a deal was reached.

“These Countries, who are playing this very dangerous game, have put a level of risk in play that is not tenable or sustainable,” he wrote, adding: “This is a very dangerous situation for the Safety, Security and Survival of our Planet”.

The US president insists Greenland is critical for US security and has said previously that Washington would get the territory “the easy way” or “the hard way”.

Greenland is a sparsely populated but resource-rich and its location between North America and the Arctic makes it well placed for early warning systems in the event of missile attacks and for monitoring vessels in the region.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Sunday told NBC News’ Meet the Press that “Greenland can only be defended if it is part of the US, and it will not need to be defended if it is part of the US”.

“I believe that the Europeans will understand that this is best for Greenland, best for Europe and best for the United States,” he said.

It is still unclear how the tariffs will affect those Trump has already imposed on the UK and EU. French President Emmanuel Macron, who is working to co-ordinate the European response to the tariff threats, said he would request that the EU activate its “anti-coercion instrument” if Trump does impose them.

The US president is due to speak at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Wednesday on the theme “how can we co-operate in a more contested world?” Macron, as well as the leaders of Germany and the EU, will also be attending the annual conference.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who will also be there, said his country was “concerned by the recent escalation” and that it would be “significantly increasing Arctic security — strengthening our military and investing in critical infrastructure”.

“Canada strongly believes that the best way to secure the Arctic is by working together within Nato,” he also wrote on X.

Mark Rutte, meanwhile, said he had spoken to Trump “regarding the security situation in Greenland and the Arctic”.

“We will continue working on this, and I look forward to seeing him in Davos later this week,” he added.

EPA/Shutterstock People take part in a protest under the slogans 'Hands off Greenland' and 'Greenland for Greenlanders' in Copenhagen, Denmark, 17 January 2026.EPA/Shutterstock

Protests were held over the weekend in both Denmark and Greenland

Public anger in both Denmark and Greenland at Trump’s threats over Greenland appears undiminished. Demonstrations against Trump’s takeover plans were held in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, on Saturday – before the tariff announcement – as well as in Danish cities.

These rallies coincide with a visit to Copenhagen by a delegation from the US Congress. Its leader, Democratic Senator Chris Coons, described Mr Trump’s rhetoric as “not constructive”.

The island’s representative to the US has said that the last time Greenlanders were asked if they wanted to be part of the US, in January 2025, only 6% were in favour of doing so, while 85% were against.

A recent poll suggests that most Americans also oppose US control of Greenland. A Reuters/Ipsos poll, which was released last Wednesday, indicated just 17% of Americans support the US taking Greenland, compared to 47% who said they opposed Trump’s push to acquire the island.

EU considers reviving €93 billion tariff move in response to Trump

0

European Union member states are discussing several options for how to respond to President Donald Trump’s latest tariff threat, including imposing retaliatory levies on €93 billion ($108 billion) of US goods, according to people familiar with the talks.

EU ambassadors met Sunday evening in Brussels as they tried to devise a joint response to Trump’s announcement that he would put 10% tariffs on eight European countries on Feb. 1 in relation to their actions in Greenland.

Among the other options being discussed is using a powerful tool known as the anti-coercion instrument, added the people, who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive conversations. French President Emmanuel Macron suggested on Sunday the bloc should consider using that new tool, although France backed away from using it in the past after Trump threatened to retaliate.

Last year, the EU had approved retaliatory tariffs on €93 billion of US products but suspended their implementation after the two sides reached a trade pact. European lawmakers suggested over the weekend that they will hold off on approving that trade pact, citing Trump’s latest move. 

The Financial Times reported earlier on the discussions over reviving retaliatory tariffs.

Inside the Fortune 500 Europe Webinar – February 11, 2026: Join Europe’s top business leaders as they explore the strategies shaping the future of the region’s most powerful companies. Register your interest.

Trump’s announcement of new tariffs on Greenland: How are EU allies reacting? | Latest updates on Donald Trump

0

United States President Donald Trump has promised to steadily increase tariffs on European countries that have opposed his move to acquire Greenland, escalating a dispute over the semiautonomous Danish territory he has long coveted.

So what is behind Trump’s push to control Greenland, the world’s largest island, and how have Washington’s NATO allies responded?

What is Trump’s tariff threat over Greenland?

In a post on his Truth Social platform on Saturday, Trump wrote that he has subsidised Denmark and other European Union countries by not charging them tariffs.

“Now, after Centuries, it is time for Denmark to give back – World Peace is at stake! China and Russia want Greenland, and there is not a thing that Denmark can do about it.”

Trump added that “the National Security of the United States, and the World at large, is at stake.”

Trump wrote that starting on February 1, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland will be charged a 10 percent tariff on all their exports to the US.

On June 1, the tariff is to be increased to 25 percent, he said. “This Tariff will be due and payable until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland,” Trump wrote.

Trump additionally wrote: “The United States has been trying to do this transaction for over 150 years. Many Presidents have tried, and for good reason, but Denmark has always refused.”

Is Trump the first US president to seek control of Greenland?

Leaders in Denmark and Greenland have consistently insisted that Greenland is not for sale. In the past few days, Greenlanders have been protesting against Trump’s wishes to acquire Greenland. Yet Trump has pushed for acquiring the Arctic territory since his first term, and he is not the first US president to pursue such a purchase.

After buying Alaska from Russia in 1867, then-Secretary of State William H Seward unsuccessfully sought to buy Greenland. During World War II, the US occupied Greenland after Germany’s invasion of Denmark and built military and radio facilities there. It maintains a permanent presence today at the Pituffik Space Base in the northwest.

In 1946, while Greenland was still a Danish colony, President Harry S Truman secretly offered Denmark $100m for the island, but Copenhagen refused. The proposal became public only in 1991.

American citizens do not support Washington acquiring Greenland, polls have indicated. This week, a Reuters/Ipsos poll of US residents showed less than one in five respondents support the idea of acquiring Greenland.

Why does Trump want Greenland?

The location and natural resources of the island make it strategically important for Washington.

Greenland is geographically part of North America, located between the Arctic Ocean and the North Atlantic Ocean. It is home to 56,000 residents, mostly Indigenous Inuit people.

Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, is closer to New York City – about 2,900km (1,800 miles) away – than the Danish capital, Copenhagen, located 3,500km (2,174 miles) to the east.

It is a NATO territory through Denmark and an EU-associated overseas territory with residents holding EU citizenship.

Its location offers the shortest air and sea routes between North America and Europe, making it strategically vital for US military operations and missile early-warning systems. Washington has also sought more radar coverage around the Greenland-Iceland-UK gap to monitor Russian and Chinese movements.

Greenland is rich in minerals, including most of the EU’s listed “critical raw materials”, but there is no oil and gas extraction, and many Indigenous residents oppose large-scale mining. The economy mainly depends on fishing.

As climate change opens up more of the Arctic, major powers such as the US, Canada, China and Russia are increasingly interested in its untapped resources.

How has Europe responded to Trump’s tariff threats?

All 27 members of the EU will convene for an emergency meeting on Sunday to discuss their response to Trump’s threat.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded in a post on X on Saturday, saying: “Our position on Greenland is very clear – it is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and its future is a matter for the Greenlanders and the Danes,” Starmer wrote.

“Applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of NATO allies is completely wrong. We will of course be pursuing this directly with the US administration.”

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also responded in an X post, saying: “The EU stands in full solidarity with Denmark and the people of Greenland. Dialogue remains essential, and we are committed to building on the process begun already last week between the Kingdom of Denmark and the US.

“Tariffs would undermine transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous downward spiral. Europe will remain united, coordinated, and committed to upholding its sovereignty.”

European Council President Antonio Costa shared a post identical to von der Leyen’s on his own X account.

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas wrote on X: “China and Russia must be having a field day. They are the ones who benefit from divisions among Allies.”

Kallas added: “Tariffs risk making Europe and the United States poorer and undermine our shared prosperity.”

David van Weel, the foreign minister of the Netherlands, said during an interview on Dutch television on Sunday: “It’s blackmail what he’s doing, … and it’s not necessary. It doesn’t help the alliance [NATO], and it also doesn’t help Greenland.”

Spotify increases subscription price for Premium users in the US and other regions

0

Spotify is raising prices for Premium subscribers in the United States, Estonia, and Latvia.

The streaming giant is notifying users this month that monthly subscription costs will increase starting in February 2026.

In the US, monthly subscription costs will rise from $11.99 to $12.99.

The price adjustment comes roughly 18 months after Spotify’s previous US price hike in July 2024, when the Premium tier increased from $10.99 to $11.99.

In communications sent to subscribers, Spotify framed the increase as necessary “to keep delivering a great experience” and enabling the company “to continue offering the best possible experience and benefit artists.”



The move follows a pattern of international price increases that Spotify has implemented across multiple markets over the past year, including the UK, Switzerland and Australia, and various markets across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific.

The US, the world’s largest recorded music market, represents a critical geography for the company’s financial performance.

As of Q3 2025, Spotify’s global Premium subscriber base reached 281 million paying users, generating quarterly operating income of €582 million ($679.83m), up 33% year-over-year.

The company achieved its first full year of operating profit in 2024, logging €1.4 billion ($1.495 billion) in Operating Income.

The company has consistently signaled that regular pricing adjustments would become an ongoing strategic priority as it pursues sustained profitability.

During the company’s recent Q3 earnings call, Co-Chief Executive Officer Alex Norström addressed questions about pricing strategy.

“We… saw steady retention rates following the rollout of our recent price increases across more than 150 markets. These results show the power of the product and the loyalty of our subscribers,” Norström said on the call.

Asked during the call why Spotify has been raising prices at different rates in different markets, Executive Chairman Daniel Ek stressed that Spotify offers a variety of products in different markets.

“In many markets where we act now, Spotify is not just a music service anymore,” he said. “It is a music, podcast and audiobooks service. In some markets, we haven’t yet gotten to with our audiobooks offering. So as you look at our pricing, we are factoring in the value, not just in music, but in all of the verticals that we act as well.”


Elsewhere, globally, Spotify is dabbling with tiered Premium Pricing.

In November, the company launched a higher-priced Premium Platinum tier in India, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and the United Arab Emirates.

The new tier, priced at more than double Spotify’s standard offering in these markets, includes lossless audioAI-powered features, and exclusive perks.

In the US, Spotify’s Premium Duo tier is going from $16.99 to $18.99 per month, while the Family plan is rising from $19.99 to $21.99. Spotify’s Student plan in the market is also increasing, from $5.99 to $6.99 per month.Music Business Worldwide

State of catastrophe declared in Ñuble and Biobío regions following deadly Chile fires

0

Chilean President Gabriel Boric has declared a state of catastrophe in two regions where deadly wildfires are raging.

At least 16 people are confirmed dead in the Ñuble and Biobío regions, about 500km (300 miles) south of the capital Santiago. At least 20,000 have been evacuated.

The most dangerous fire has swept through dry forests bordering the coastal city of Concepción. About 250 homes have been destroyed, disaster officials said.

Local media show pictures of charred cars in the streets. Chile has experienced a series of devastating fires in recent years, worsened by long-term drought.

Chile’s forestry agency, Conaf, said firefighters were battling a total of 24 fires across the country on Sunday. The most threatening, it added, were in Ñuble and Biobío.

“In light of the serious ongoing wildfires, I have decided to declare a state of catastrophe” in the two regions, Boric said in a post on X. “All resources are available,” he added.

The fires have affected 20,000 hectares (50,000 acres) in the two regions so far, local media say.

The bulk of the evacuations were carried out in the cities of Penco and Lirquen, just north of Concepción, which have a combined population of 60,000.

Strong winds have fanned the flames amid summer temperatures, endangering communities and hampering firefighting efforts.

Much of Chile is under heat alerts, with temperatures expected to reach 38C between Santiago and Biobío in the next two days.

Two years ago, forest fires killed at least 120 people in the Valparaíso region near Santiago.

After facing Ali, Foreman, and Holmes, Ken Norton knew who the best ever was.

0

Ken Norton once identified a former opponent as the greatest heavyweight of all time, saying that landing a punch on him was like ‘hitting a piece of cement.’

The former world heavyweight champion was perhaps best known for edging a split decision against Muhammad Ali in 1973, before losing their immediate rematch as well as a third encounter three years later.

Along with Ali, though, the American also locked horns with George Foreman, Larry Holmes and Ernie Shavers, who all got the better of him one way or another.

His clash with Foreman, for instance, ended via a devastating second-round finish, which came around seven months before the knockout artist’s iconic Rumble in the Jungle with Ali.

Against Holmes, it was a far more competitive 15-round battle that saw Norton lose a split decision, before getting wiped out by Shavers – in the first round, no less – just two fights later.

But while Norton faced a selection of formidable heavyweights, most of them in their prime, his trilogy with Ali was ultimately enough to determine who, in his view, was the very best.

Speaking with ESPN Radio before his passing in 2013, the Jacksonville man insisted that Ali was also the strongest opponent he faced, thus justifying his reasoning for highlighting him as the greatest heavyweight of all time.

“As far as I’ve been around, yes [Ali is the best ever]. Ali was very strong but because he wasn’t a one-punch KO artist, [his strength] is overlooked. Hitting Ali in the body or on the arms was like hitting a piece of cement.”

The fact that Norton fought Ali and Foreman so soon before their encounter in 1974 should indicate that he, more than most, would have known exactly what the two heavyweights were capable of.

Not only that, but a total of 39 rounds shared with Ali, specifically, would have given Norton a firm understanding of just how great he truly was.

Challenging Client

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Is the global humanitarian system failing? A look at the Russia-Ukraine war with Jagan Chapagain

0

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies chief on US aid cuts, attacks on aid workers and whether neutrality can survive modern wars.

As wars intensify and donor funding dries up, the global humanitarian system is under unprecedented strain. Jagan Chapagain, secretary-general of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, warns that life-saving operations are being scaled back just as needs explode from Gaza and Sudan to Ukraine and climate-driven disasters worldwide. He addresses United States and European aid cuts, attacks on humanitarian workers, the erosion of international law, and whether neutrality and protection still mean anything in today’s conflicts.