The technocratic body will operate under the direction of Trump’s ‘board of peace’, stacked with pro-Israel figures.
The Palestinian committee tasked with overseeing the future administration of Gaza as part of a US-backed ceasefire plan has released what it says is a “mission statement”, laying out its key priorities and goals.
The general commissioner of the National Committee for Gaza Management (NGAC), Ali Shaath, said that the technocratic body would seek to restore core services and cultivate a society “rooted in peace”.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 itemsend of list
“Under the guidance of the Board of Peace, chaired by [US] President Donald J Trump, and with the support and assistance of the High Representative for Gaza, our mission is to rebuild the Gaza Strip not just in infrastructure but also in spirit,” Shaath said in a statement.
The NGAC was established as part of Trump’s 20-point peace plan for Gaza and authorised under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2803. The White House has said it will be concerned with the day-to-day rebuilding and stabilisation of the enclave, “while laying the foundation for long-term, self-sustaining governance”.
Under Trump’s plan, the reconstruction of Gaza would be broadly overseen by a “board of peace” and more closely guided by a “Gaza executive board”.
The NGAC faces enormous challenges. Gaza has been physically destroyed after more than two years of Israel’s genocidal war, and there is widespread scepticism from Palestinians over how much autonomy the body will have.
Those concerns have been compounded by the presence of firm supporters of Israel, and a lack of Palestinians, so far, on the board of peace and the Gaza executive board.
In his statement, Shaath, a former Palestinian Authority (PA) deputy minister, said the body would focus on establishing security control of the Strip, more than half of which remains under direct Israeli control, and restoring basic services destroyed throughout the war.
“We are committed to establishing security, restoring the essential services that form the bedrock of human dignity such as electricity, water, healthcare, and education, as well as cultivating a society rooted in peace, democracy, and justice,” he said.
“Operating with the highest standards of integrity and transparency, the NCAG will forge a productive economy capable of replacing unemployment with opportunity for all.”
In defiance of an existing ceasefire agreement between Israel and the Palestinian armed group Hamas, Israel has maintained severe restrictions on the entry of aid into Gaza, which UN agencies and humanitarian groups have said is necessary to deliver services to Palestinians.
Hundreds of Palestinians have also been killed by Israeli strikes in Gaza during that period, bringing the death toll to 71,548 since October 7, 2023.
The board of peace was announced as part of phase two of the ceasefire agreement, but letters from Trump inviting foreign leaders to join the body have suggested the US president may see it as a model for bypassing traditional international forums, such as the UN.
In mid-December, Israel announced it was banning more than three dozen international aid organisations from operating in Gaza.
Some Palestinians also worry that the NGAC’s technocratic approach may circumvent key political questions, such as the creation of a future Palestinian state and an end to Israel’s decades-long occupation of the Palestinian territory, in favour of a focus on economic development and outside investment opportunities.
In his statement, Shaath said the committee will “embrace peace, through which we strive to secure the path to true Palestinian rights and self determination”.
The FBI is asking agents across the US to travel to Minneapolis for temporary duty, according to people familiar with the situation.
The bureau in recent days sent messages to agents nationwide seeking volunteers to temporarily transfer to the city, the people said. The messages didn’t specifically reference the anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement protests that have escalated in the city and didn’t detail the assignment, the people said.
The Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security have already been increasing their presence in Minneapolis. The city has become a focal point of anti-ICE protests since an officer shot and killed a woman, Renee Good, on Jan. 7 while she was in her car.
It wasn’t immediately clear what the FBI would ask agents who volunteered to travel to Minneapolis to do. FBI agents have traditionally focused on national security-related tasks such as counter-terrorism, organized crime and high-profile violent crimes.
FBI Director Kash Patel and US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday visited Minneapolis, according to a post shared on Patel’s X account. Patel said in the post that the FBI was “cracking down on violent rioters and investigating the funding networks supporting the criminal actors with multiple arrests already.”
The FBI declined to comment.
President Donald Trump has also threatened to send military forces to quell demonstrations.
A federal judge on Friday ordered immigration officers not to arrest, detain, pepper-spray or otherwise retaliate against peaceful protesters in Minneapolis after demonstrators alleged their constitutional rights were being violated.
The Department of Homeland Security “is taking appropriate and constitutional measures to uphold the rule of law and protect our officers and the public from dangerous rioters,” Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the agency, said in a statement to Bloomberg in response to the ruling.
Immigration has traditionally not been a core FBI mission. Roughly one-quarter of agents within the bureau were assigned to work on immigration-related duties, according to data that Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, shared with media outlets in October.
US President Donald Trump’s apparently coercive threat to force Western allies not to oppose his proposed annexation of Greenland, or face further damage to their trade with the US, is without both parallel and precedent.
We’ve had some unusual and unexpected economic threats from President Trump over the past year, but I think it is safe to say this exceeds all of them, and takes us into both surreal and utterly dangerous territory.
If taken at face value, it is a form of economic war being levied by the White House on its closest allies.
That’s because it targets allies at incredibly short notice and for a cause that essentially could break up Nato and the western alliance.
This will be leaving officials from those countries absolutely baffled. In fact, it’s so outlandish that they may indeed be more baffled than angry.
Nobody in the world would assume that a threat like this – based on acquiring the land of your ally – would ever actually happen. Does Trump really have the backing in the US, in Congress, even in his own administration to do this?
Is this, as some trade officials have to assume, the biggest TACO (Trump will Chicken Out) of all time? These things can come and go and, economically, these countries have handled the damage so far.
Greenland: ‘Diplomatic channels are the way to go’, US speaker tells BBC
Think of Canada. It has seen its trade with the US slump. But its prime minister Mark Carney’s strategy has seen Canada’s trade surge with the rest of the world by 14% – which amazingly is worth more than was needed to cover its trade lost with the US.
Carney has been in China this week pushing “a new world order” and pursuing more trade with China, not the detachment sought by some US administration officials.
“This is China versus the world,” the Trump administration was trying to persuade the rest of the world just three months ago.
Carney is showing up this approach, something which is perhaps notable background context for the timing of today’s intervention.
If, however, we do take Trump’s latest threats seriously, they are extremely troubling.
Not so much because of the 10% tariff, but because of its rationale – taking land from an ally, and the act of publicly trying to coerce your allies. How would the world react if China or Russia had sent a threat like this to some of their allies?
The basis of the threat is clearly deeply worrying.
Many in capitals around the world will read Trump’s social media announcement and question the functioning of American decision making.
President Trump arrives to meet leaders of the allied countries whose economies he has just threatened at the World Economic Forum on Wednesday.
Most of the world will hope that, by that time, this unparalleled threat will have somehow disappeared.
Longtime music exec Derek Cournoyer is jumping ship from indie music publisher Kobalt to AI music company ElevenLabs.
ElevenLabs said Cournoyer has been appointed Strategy Lead, Music Business Affairs at the company, which operates Eleven Music, an AI music-making platform that rivals Suno and Udio – but uses legally licensed songs to train its AI.
MBW understands that Cournoyer was instrumental in the negotiations between Kobalt and ElevenLabs that led to last year’s partnership between the two companies, under which Kobalt artists can participate in the training of the Eleven Music Pro platform. ElevenLabs also signed a partnership with indie licensing organization Merlin.
In his new role, Cournoyer will be based in Los Angeles and will be “central to shaping ElevenLabs’ music business strategy and managing industry relations across record labels, music publishers and collection societies,” ElevenLabs said.
“Few people understand the intersection of music and AI better than Derek, and we’re ecstatic to have him onboard. He’s been at the forefront of crafting the frameworks for long-term, high-value, and pro-artist partnership between the music industry and AI companies like ElevenLabs,” the company’s General Counsel and Head of Global Affairs, Alex Haskell, said.
“He has a deep understanding of the concerns and needs of artists, songwriters, producers and their teams, as well as the enormous opportunity that companies like ours offer to the creative community.”
Alex Haskell, ElevenLabs
“He has a deep understanding of the concerns and needs of artists, songwriters, producers and their teams, as well as the enormous opportunity that companies like ours offer to the creative community.”
“ElevenLabs has built one of the most advanced and widely respected AI audio platforms in the market.”
Derek Cournoyer, ElevenLabs
Cournoyer had been with Kobalt for around a decade, most recently serving as SVP, Global Digital Business – a position to which he was appointed just last July.
He played a key role in shaping the company’s AI and creator-economy strategies and worked on deals and partnerships with the likes of Meta, TikTok and YouTube.
In a post on LinkedIn announcing his move to ElevenLabs, Cournoyer said he was “excited” to begin work at the company.
“ElevenLabs has built one of the most advanced and widely respected AI audio platforms in the market,” he wrote.
“The progress the team has made speaks for itself, and the clarity, speed, and seriousness with which they’re advancing the technology is exceptional. Joining at this moment feels both timely and meaningful.”
The appointment also arrived four months after ElevenLabssecured strategic investment from chip maker NVIDIA, the world’s most valuable company by market cap, worth around $4.4 trillion as of Tuesday morning (September 23).Music Business Worldwide
CENTCOM says the strike in northwest Syria on Friday killed a man tied to the December attack that killed US troops and an interpreter.
Published On 17 Jan 202617 Jan 2026
Share
The United States says an air strike in northwestern Syria has killed an al-Qaeda-affiliated leader who had ties to an ISIL (ISIS) member involved in a deadly ambush of US forces last month.
The US Central Command (CENTCOM) said on Saturday that an air strike a day earlier killed Bilal Hasan al-Jasim, who was “directly connected with the ISIS gunman who killed and injured American and Syrian personnel” in mid-December.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 itemsend of list
“There is no safe place for those who conduct, plot, or inspire attacks on American citizens and our warfighters. We will find you,” CENTCOM Commander Brad Cooper said in a statement.
Two US soldiers and a military interpreter were killed in the ISIL ambush in the Syrian city of Palmyra on December 13.
Since then, the US has carried out a series of large-scale strikes in Syria in what it says is a response to the deadly attack on US forces.
On Saturday, CENTCOM said US forces and their partners had struck more than 100 ISIL “infrastructure and weapons” sites since the US military launched its retaliatory operation in December.
“Additionally, US and partner forces have captured more than 300 ISIS operatives and killed over 20 across Syria during the past year,” it said.
US President Donald Trump had promised to inflict significant damage on those responsible for the deadly attack on US troops.
“I can tell you, in Syria, there will be a lot of big damage done to the people that did it,” Trump said on December 13.
A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.
Protesters in Greenland rallied on Saturday against any US move acquire the territory
A threat by President Donald Trump to impose fresh tariffs on eight allies opposed to his proposed takeover of Greenland has drawn condemnation from European leaders.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the move was “completely wrong”, while French President Emmanuel Macron called it “unacceptable”.
The comments came after Trump announced a 10% tariff on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands and Finland would come into force on 1 February but could later rise to 25% – and would last until a deal was reached.
Mr Trump insists the autonomous Danish territory is critical for US security and has not ruled out taking it by force.
Meanwhile, thousands of people took to the streets in Greenland and Denmark on Saturday in protest at the proposed US takeover.
Greenland is sparsely populated but resource-rich and its location between North America and the Arctic makes it well placed for early warning systems in the event of missile attacks and for monitoring vessels in the region.
Trump has previously said Washington would get the territory “the easy way” or “the hard way”.
Greenland: ‘Diplomatic channels are the way to go’ US speaker tells BBC before tariff announcement
European countries have rallied to Denmark’s support. They have argued that the security of the Arctic region should be a joint Nato responsibility.
France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands and the UK have dispatched a small number of troops to Greenland in a so-called reconnaissance mission.
Announcing the new tariffs in a post on his Truth Social platform on Saturday, Trump said those countries were playing “a very dangerous game”. At stake, he said, was the “Safety, Security, and Survival of our Planet”.
He said the proposed 10% levy to be introduced next month on goods exported to the US would rise to 25% in June and remain “payable until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland”.
In his response, Starmer said: “Applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of Nato allies is completely wrong. We will of course be pursuing this directly with the US administration.”
France’s Emmanuel Macron said: “Tariff threats are unacceptable in this context… We will not be swayed by any intimidation.”
Swedish PM Ulf Kristersson said: We won’t let ourselves be blackmailed.”
“Sweden is currently having intensive discussions with other EU countries, Norway and the United Kingdom to find a joint response,” he added.
European Council President Antonio Costa stated: “The European Union will always be very firm in defending international law… which of course begins within the territory of the member states of the European Union.”
Denmark’s foreign minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said the threat had “come as a surprise”.
Meanwhile, German MEP Manfred Weber, head of the conservative EPP group in the European Parliament, said Trump’s move raised questions about the still-to-be-ratified EU-US trade deal negotiated last year.
Brussels and Washington clinched a deal that agreed a US tariff on all EU goods of 15% and that the 27-member bloc would open its markets to US exporters with 0% tariffs on certain products.
“The EPP is in favour of the EU-US trade deal, but given Donald Trump’s threats regarding Greenland, approval is not possible at this stage,” Weber posted on X. “The 0% tariffs on US products must be put on hold,” he added.
Reuters
Trump has recently escalated his drive to acquire Greenland
The US ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, however, said Denmark “just doesn’t have the resources or the capacity to do what needs to be done in the northern region”.
He told Fox News the life of Greenlanders would be “safer, stronger and more prosperous under the umbrella of the United States”.
Trump has often mused that “tariff” is his favourite word, and he has made clear that he views it as something of a blunt instrument with which to convince – or coerce – countries around the world to align their policies with the desired outcomes of the White House.
But his announcement represents a significant escalation in his recently rekindled drive to acquire Greenland, despite their opposition.
It is unclear what immediately prompted the tariffs announcement, which Trump first hinted at while speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday.
While in recent weeks he has repeatedly said that a variety of options – including the potential use of military force – remained on the table, the announcement comes just days after US and Danish officials agreed to set up a high-level working group to discuss the future of the island.
In Washington’s diplomatic and political circles, that announcement was seen by many as a “best-case” scenario for Denmark and its European allies – one that would, at the very least, delay any decision or further escalation from the White House.
Instead, the latest tariffs have injected a newfound sense of urgency into the issue and strained relations with important Nato allies and trading partners.
EPA
Protesters in Copenhagen waved Greenland’s white and red flag in support of self-determination
Opinion polls suggest 85% of Greenlanders oppose the territory joining the US.
In the Danish capital, Copenhagen, placards were held up reading: “Hands Off Greenland” and “Greenland for Greenlanders”.
“We demand respect for the Danish Realm and for Greenland’s right to self-determination,” said Camilla Siezing, heads of Inuit, an umbrella group of Greenlandic associations.
In Nuuk, Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen joined protesters holding signs reading “Greenland is not for sale” and “we shape our future” as they headed for the US consulate.
The rallies coincide with a visit to Copenhagen by a delegation from the US Congress. Its leader, Democratic Senator Chris Coons, described Mr Trump’s rhetoric as “not constructive”.
Watch: Why is there so much international interest in Greenland?
By the time Thomas Hearns challenged for his first world title in his 29th professional fight, only three men had heard the final bell against the Detroit knockout specialist.
Hearns’ final outing came, remarkably, in 2006, bringing to a close a 67-fight career spanning 29 years. Along the way he contested 19 world title bouts and won championships across five weight divisions. He is, of course, best remembered for his iconic battles with his fellow ‘Four Kings’ — Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard and Marvin Hagler.
The Ring magazine asked Hearns to name the toughest chin he faced during his career, and his answer was unequivocal.
“Marvelous Marvin Hagler. Hands down. He took a lot of shots and kept coming.”
From the opening bell, the fight erupted into a fearless exchange, with both men inviting the other to unleash their heaviest artillery. Atomic shots were traded in a brutal, uncompromising contest that lasted just eight minutes and one second.
The 15,128 in attendance at Caesars Palace watched in awe as a bloodied Hagler stalked Hearns, absorbing everything the challenger could offer before the champion’s relentless pressure told. Hearns was stopped in the third round.
What was scheduled as a 12-round marathon became a three-round sprint — and in the furnace of one of boxing’s greatest fights, Hagler proved the superior finisher.
The future arrived on December 28, 2025 as the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) announced that Iron Beam became the first high-energy tactical laser weapon to be fully integrated and cleared for operations in a national defense array. And it’s not alone.
When the invention of the laser by Theodore Maiman at the Hughes Research Laboratories was made public on July 7, 1960, the press immediately saw the military possibilities, with the Los Angeles Herald proclaiming “LA Man Discovers Science-Fiction Death Ray.”
In the months and years that followed, popular media would often talk about the destructive potential of lasers with the Associated Press publishing an article that proclaimed that a satellite armed with a laser could control the Earth. Concepts of laser weapons were common while thrillers like 1964’s Goldfinger cemented the concept of the laser weapon in the public’s mind.
The Iron Beam Laser
Rafael
However, reality was very, very far behind. For years the laser was infamous as the solution in search of a problem and although lasers could be spectacular, they were hardly weapons-grade in the 1960s. Just look at the fact that the power of the laser then was measured in Gillettes. That is, how many razor blades a laser beam could cut through at one time.
Even as the laser found applications in science and technology, giving rise to miracle surgery and revolutionary communications, lasers mainly found military applications as targeting systems and range finders. The only real laser weapon that saw service during the 20th century was a low-power laser used by the Royal Navy during the 1982 Falklands War to temporarily dazzle and distract enemy pilots.
Not that this was due to lack of trying. Both the US and the Soviet Union had ambitious programs to develop laser weapons. The Americans even modified a Boeing 747 to carry a huge experimental and alarmingly dangerous chemical laser designed to shoot down intercontinental ballistic missiles that was more of a menace to the crew than the missiles.
The Apollo laser weapon
EOS
In the past two decades the development of a new generation of lasers began to change all this. The basic problem was three fold. First, figure out how to make a laser with enough power to be practical. Second, learn how to seek targets. Third, how to adjust the beam to compensate for atmospheric effects.
The breakthrough was the development of solid-state lasers that use bundles of glass fibers doped with exotic elements like ytterbium, erbium, and thulium along with aluminum, germanium, and phosphorus. These curled up bundles allowed for very long, efficient lasers to be stuffed into very small volumes and new technologies allowed multiple lasers to be combined into a single, far more powerful beam.
At the business end, new targeting systems were developed to identify and lock onto targets quickly. Along with this came systems that used things like reference lasers to analyze the air between the weapon and target so the deadly beam could be altered to compensate for any distortion.
The Rheinmetall/MBDA navy laser
Rheinmetall
The result of all this is that in recent years new laser weapons were beginning to show up and these weren’t just coming from the usual suspects like the United States nor were these mere concepts that might one day lead to practical systems. They were popping up in Russia, China, South Korea, France, Britain, Turkey, Japan, Germany, India, and, most notably Israel.
Israel’s Iron Beam began life in 1996 as a joint US/Israel project. Originally conceived as a chemical deuterium fluoride laser, it swapped over to solid-state, electrically-powered, ytterbium-doped lasers when it moved to Rafael Advanced Defense Systems. In 2024, recent conflicts resulted in the system being fast tracked for combat duty to intercept hostile drones and missiles and now it has been officially integrated into Israel’s armed forces as the innermost layer of the air defenses tasked with intercepting short-range threats, including rockets and mortars.
As far as laser weapons are concerned, this is a major milestone. While other systems have been deployed with various militaries and have even been tested in combat, this is the first time that a laser weapon has been formally added to a country’s armed forces as a fully integrated system.
The US LOCUST laser mounted on a tactical vehicle
AeroVironment
The reason why this has taken so long is that there’s a big difference between developing a functional, practical laser weapon and making one that’s fully operational. Modern weapon systems act as one component in a much larger – often global – network. They also have to be compatible with a very complex logistical supply and maintenance line. Not to mention that there has to be an actual production line for the weapon instead of it being a series of one-offs.
That’s why online assertions that this or that experimental weapon should be rushed to the front lines immediately because this or that cause me to rub my eyes.
For a laser weapon to be fully operational, it needs to be rugged enough to handle being knocked about like any other piece of equipment. Systems under development are designed (oddly enough) for development. They include things like manual overrides to shut the laser down if it runs into problems like unexpected software reboots or cooling systems suddenly having troubles with dust. They also need safety buffers to make sure the system doesn’t accidentally harm anything as it’s watched by the monitoring safety team– a requirement that combat systems don’t have.
The UK Dragonfire laser
Crown copyright
In addition, test units work alone while operational ones must integrate with command and control systems that can decide in milliseconds whether to fire on a suspected target. Add to this, operational units must be built to military specifications, withstand nasty environments and inadequate storage conditions – all while maintaining reliability. If something does go wrong, a field technician has to be able to bang it back into shape. That means having standard spares available and maintenance procedures drawn up and tested.
Finally, the targets are different for development lasers and combat lasers. The targets used for development are scripted or semi-controlled, so the engineers can lock down all the variables and concentrate on only one problem at a time. On the other hand, combat lasers have to handle live saturation attacks that are the complete opposite of controlled.
What all this boils down to is that even a laser weapon that’s already shooting down hostile drones is streets away from one that’s officially part of the armory.
Currently, there are about 17 tactical lasers that are operational, combat-cleared, field tested, or under development. With the advantages of a weapon that can engage targets at the speed of light, has an infinite ammo magazine, and costs the famous “dollar-a-shot” to operate, there’s a lot of incentive to bring these online.
It’s an incentive that’s so great that the Royal Navy has pushed its schedule forward to field its Dragonfire laser to 2027 and others are likely also to see the fast track in the near future. In the short term, these systems will be used to counter drones as well as rockets, mortars, and other close-in aerial threats.
However, that’s only the short term.
As to the long term? That is anyone’s guess. If these tactical lasers fulfill their promise, they could be the biggest change to the battlefield since gunpowder went from fireworks to guns. That started up as popguns on sticks and ended with ballistic missiles that could reach any spot on Earth in minutes.
Where a class of weapons that started out as glorified pointers will go makes the phrase Death Star jump easily to mind.