-8.9 C
New York
Sunday, January 25, 2026
Home Blog Page 9

House committee decides to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress

0

A House committee advanced resolutions Wednesday to hold former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress over the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, opening the prospect of the House using one of its most powerful punishments against a former president for the first time.

In bipartisan votes, the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee approved the contempt of Congress charges, setting up potential votes in the House early next month. In a rare departure from party lines, some Democrats supported the contempt measures against the Clintons, with several progressive lawmakers emphasizing the need for full transparency in the Epstein investigation.

The votes were the latest turn in the Epstein saga as Congress investigates how the late financier was able to sexually abuse dozens of teenage girls for years.

“No witness, not a former president or a private citizen, may willfully defy a congressional subpoena without consequence. But that is what the Clintons did and that is why we are here,” Rep. James Comer, the chairman, said at the session on Wednesday.

The repercussions of contempt charges loomed large, given the possibility of a substantial fine and even incarceration. Still, there were signs of a potential thaw as the Clintons appeared to be searching for an off-ramp to testify. In addition, passage of contempt charges through the full House was far from guaranteed, requiring a majority vote — something Republicans increasingly struggle to achieve.

The Clintons have said they had nothing to do with Epstein for decades and are seeking a resolution to the dispute. This week, they offered to have the committee leadership and staff interview Bill Clinton in New York.

Comer rejected that offer Tuesday, insisting that any interview also have an official transcript.

What do lawmakers want to know from the Clintons?

The push in Washington for a reckoning over Epstein has shown details of the connections between the wealthy financier and both Bill Clinton and Trump, among many other high-powered men. Epstein killed himself in 2019 in a New York jail cell while awaiting trial.

Bill Clinton, President Donald Trump and many others connected to Epstein have not been accused of wrongdoing. Yet lawmakers are wrestling over who receives the most scrutiny.

A spokesman for the Clintons, Angel Ureña, said on social media that the Clintons are trying to help the Epstein investigation but that “both Clintons have been out of office for over a decade. Neither had anything to do with him for more than 20 years.”

Behind the scenes, longtime Clinton lawyer David Kendall has tried to negotiate an agreement with Comer for months. Kendall raised the prospect of having the Clintons testify on Christmas and Christmas Eve, according to the committee’s account of the negotiations.

The Clintons, who contend the subpoenas are invalid because they do not serve any legislative purpose, have also offered the committee written declarations about their interactions with Epstein.

How Democrats are approaching the issue

Democrats have largely been focused on advancing the investigation into Epstein rather than mounting a defense of the Clintons, who led their party for decades. They agreed that Bill Clinton should inform the committee if he has any pertinent information about Epstein’s abuses.

A wealthy financier, Epstein donated to Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign and Hillary Clinton’s joint fundraising committee ahead of her 2000 Senate campaign in New York.

“No president or former president is above the law,” the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Robert Garcia, said at the hearing.

On Wednesday, Democrats tried to advance several changes to the contempt of Congress charges. Several argued that Hillary Clinton should be exempted because she has said she had very little personal interaction with Epstein. Democratic lawmakers also tried to downgrade the contempt of Congress resolution to a civil rather than criminal offense.

Democrats spent the hearing criticizing Comer for focusing on the Clintons when the Justice Department is running a month late on a congressionally-mandated deadline to publicly release its case files on Epstein. Comer has also allowed several former attorneys general to provide the committee with written statements attesting to their limited knowledge of the case.

The committee had also subpoenaed Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s longtime confidant, who is serving a lengthy prison sentence for a conviction on sex trafficking charges. But Comer declined to press for the interview after Maxwell’s attorney indicated she would invoke Fifth Amendment rights in any deposition.

“It’s interesting that it’s this subpoena only that Republicans and the chairman have been obsessed about putting all their energy behind,” Garcia said.

Comer said the committee will interview Maxwell next month. Attorney General Pam Bondi will also appear before the House Judiciary Committee in February.

In the end, nine Democrats voted with all Republicans on the committee to advance contempt against Bill Clinton, and three Democrats — Reps. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania, Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan — joined in the vote to advance the contempt resolution for Hillary Clinton.

Democrats embraced the call for full transparency on Epstein after Trump’s return to the White House, particularly after Bondi stumbled on her promise to release the entirety of the unredacted Epstein files to the public. The backlash scrambled traditional ideological lines, leading Republicans to side with Democrats demanding further investigation.

The pressure eventually resulted in a bipartisan subpoena from the committee that ordered the Justice Department and Epstein’s estate to release files related to Epstein. Republicans quickly moved to include the Clintons in the subpoena.

Comer has indicated that he will insist that the subpoena be fulfilled by nothing less than a transcribed deposition of Bill Clinton.

“They’re going to have two weeks until this bill is on the floor,” he said Wednesday

How contempt proceedings have been used

Contempt of Congress proceedings are rare, used historically as a last resort when lawmakers are trying to force testimony for high-profile investigations, such as the infamous inquiry during the 1940s into alleged Communist sympathizers in Hollywood or the impeachment proceedings of President Richard Nixon.

Most recently, Trump’s advisers Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon were convicted of contempt charges for defying subpoenas from a House panel investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, riot by a mob of the Republican president’s supporters at the Capitol. Both Navarro and Bannon spent months in prison.

The Jan. 6 committee also subpoenaed Trump in its inquiry. Trump’s lawyers resisted the subpoena, citing decades of legal precedent they said shielded ex-presidents from being ordered to appear before Congress. The committee ultimately withdrew its subpoena.

No former president has ever been successfully forced to appear before Congress, although some have voluntarily appeared.

But some Republicans said they should face the same consequences for refusing to testify as Bannon and Navarro.

Rep. Andy Biggs, an Arizona Republican, said on social media that if the Clintons “aren’t perp walked, we will have failed the American people.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Donald Trump to Head Signing Ceremony for Gaza ‘Board of Peace’ Charter at Davos | Latest Updates on President Trump

0

Concord invests strategically in Giant Music, an indie label under The Azoff Company

0

Concord has made a strategic investment in Giant Music, the independent record label founded by The Azoff Company.

Details around the investment, including the size of the deal, weren’t disclosed in the press release issued by the companies on Wednesday (January 21).

In addition to receiving investment from Concord, Giant has entered into a global distribution partnership with Los Angeles-based Stem, which was acquired by Concord in 2025.

Giant Music, according to Wednesday’s press release, “will continue to operate independently while benefiting from Concord’s investment and Stem’s global infrastructure”.

The announcement added that Concord’s investment “further strengthens the Giant’s position as a top independent label while maintaining full creative and operational autonomy”.

Launched in 2022, Giant’s roster includes rising artists across pop, rock, and hip-hop, including platinum-selling artists Cash Cobain, Ruel, and more.

Concord said that its investment will further “supercharge Giant’s continued expansion across artist development, marketing, and global reach”.

On the distribution front, Concord said that Stem will serve as Giant’s worldwide distribution partner, “supporting the label with the infrastructure, expertise, and hands-on execution needed to scale”.

The announcement added that “Stem will work alongside Giant as a true partner, combining music-first strategy, technology, and agility to help its artists build sustainable, long-term careers”.

“This evolution of Giant Records will not only be a game changer for the artists on our roster but also the next generation of independent artists we are lucky enough to work with.”

Jeffrey Azoff

Jeffrey Azoff, CEO of Full Stop Management and COO of The Azoff Company, said: “We have assembled an all-star team at Giant led by Nate Albert, Shawn Holiday, and Matt LaMotte.

“Partnering with Concord and Stem takes everything to another level. This evolution of Giant Records will not only be a game changer for the artists on our roster but also the next generation of independent artists we are lucky enough to work with.”

“This investment underscores our confidence in the Giant team, its exceptional roster of artists, and our shared commitment to empowering artists with the support they need to realize their ambitions.”

Bob Valentine, Concord

Bob Valentine, CEO of Concord, said: “Giant Music is grounded in a strong foundation and guided by a clear, forward-looking vision.  This investment underscores our confidence in the Giant team, its exceptional roster of artists, and our shared commitment to empowering artists with the support they need to realize their ambitions.”

“Giant has a reputation for delivering what others can’t. We’re proud to support them as an independent partner, providing the agility and infrastructure needed to bring ambitious ideas to life.”

Milana Lewis, Stem

Milana Lewis, CEO of Stem, added: “Giant is exactly the kind of partner Stem was built for. There are longstanding relationships here, and it’s always rewarding to build alongside people you respect and enjoy working with.

“Giant has a reputation for delivering what others can’t. We’re proud to support them as an independent partner, providing the agility and infrastructure needed to bring ambitious ideas to life.”


Cash Cobain earned a Gold certification and Top 5 U.S. radio hit with Fisherrr, has surpassed one billion global streams, and was named Spotify RapCaviar Rookie of the Year and Apple Music Up Next.

He also recently collaborated with Drake, Cardi B, and Don Toliver following work as a producer on Justin Bieber’s Grammy-nominated album Swag and a tour with Ice Spice.



Ruel, meanwhile, recently released Kicking My Feet, his highest-charting US album to date, earning hundreds of millions of streams and Triple J Hottest Records of 2025 recognition, with a 2026 tour including North American theaters and Lollapalooza South America.

The label is also home to FendiDa Rappa, whose Point Me 2 featuring Cardi B is certified Gold and Top 10 at Urban radio; Grammy-winning producer Mike WiLL Made-It, who is releasing new music in 2026; Deb Never, coming off a performance at Camp Flog Gnaw with an album produced by Romil Hemnani due in 2026; and Empress Of, who recently supported Lorde on tour and is preparing a new 2026 project with collaborators Matt Cohn and Mike Sabath.Music Business Worldwide

Former intelligence officer faces trial in Austria’s largest espionage case in decades

0

Bethany BellVienna correspondent

Reuters A man with a black jacket and tie and dark hair and glasses stares at a cameraReuters

Egisto Ott is accused of collecting large amounts of data and handing information to Russian intelligence

Former intelligence official Egisto Ott goes on trial in Vienna on Thursday, accused of spying for Russia in what is being dubbed Austria’s biggest spy trial in years.

Egisto Ott, 63, is charged with having handed over information to Russian intelligence officers and to Jan Marsalek, the fugitive executive of collapsed German payments firm Wirecard.

Ott denies the charges.

Jan Marsalek, who is also an Austrian citizen, is wanted by German police for alleged fraud and is currently believed to be in Moscow, having fled via Austria in 2020.

The subject of an Interpol Red Notice, he is alleged to be an intelligence asset for the FSB, Russia’s secretive security service.

The spy scandal has revived fears that Austria remains a hotbed of Russian espionage activity and observers will also be watching closely for details that could emerge about Marsalek.

Prosecutors in Vienna say Egisto Ott “abused his authority” as an Austrian intelligence official by collecting large amounts of personal data, such as locations, vehicle registration numbers, or travel movements.

They say he did this between 2015 and 2020 without authorisation, often using national and international police databases.

Prosecutors also charge him with supporting “a secret intelligence service of the Russian Federation to the detriment of the Republic of Austria” by collecting secret facts and a large amount of personal data from police databases between 2017 and 2021.

They say Egisto Ott gave this information to Jan Marsalek and unknown representatives of the Russian intelligence service, and received payment in return.

In 2022, prosecutors say, Jan Marsalek commissioned him to obtain a laptop containing secret electronic security hardware used by EU states for secure electronic communication. The laptop, they say, was handed over to the Russian intelligence service.

He is also suspected, reports say, of having passed phone data from senior Austrian interior ministry officials to Russia.

Austria’s Standard newspaper says Egisto Ott apparently obtained the work phones after they accidentally fell into the River Danube on an interior ministry boating trip.

He is alleged to have copied their contents and passed them on to Jan Marsalek, and Moscow.

Egisto Ott is charged with abuse of authority and corruption and espionage against Austria and faces up to five years in prison, if he is found guilty.

When he was arrested in 2024, Austria’s then Chancellor, Karl Nehammer, described the case as “a threat to democracy and our country’s national security”.

Munich Police Munich police wanted poster for Jan MarsalekMunich Police

Jan Marsalek, former executive at Wirecard, is believed to have escaped to Moscow

In a separate development, prosecutors in the Austrian town of Wiener Neustadt have told the BBC that a former MP, Thomas Schellenbacher, has been charged with helping Marsalek to escape following the collapse of the Wirecard company in 2020, when it emerged that €1.9bn was missing from its accounts.

Schellenbacher is alleged to have helped Jan Marsalek fly to Belarus, from Bad Vöslau in Austria, in June 2020.

Schellenbacher was an MP for the far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ), which has been accused by Austria’s Green Party, now in opposition, of enabling Russian espionage, of acting as “an extension of Russia’s arm” in Austria.

The FPÖ and its leader Herbert Kickl have denied the allegations – and have not faced any legal action in connection with any of them.

Marsalek, who was the Wirecard’s Chief Operating Officer, has since been charged with fraud and embezzlement, suspected of having inflated company’s balance sheet total and sales volume.

He is also believed to have been the controller of a group of Bulgarians who were convicted in London in 2025, of spying for Russia.

Messages from that trial reveal Marsalek has had plastic surgery to alter his appearance as well as details of his life as a fugitive.

“I’m off to bed. Had another cosmetic surgery, trying to look differently, and I am dead tired and my head hurts,” he wrote to one of the Bulgarians, Roussev, on Telegram in February 2022.

In another, dated 11 May 2021, Roussev congratulated Marsalek for learning Russian.

“Well I am trying to improve my skills on a few fronts. Languages is one of them,” the Austrian responded.

“In my new role as an international fugitive I must outperform James Bond.”

Challenging Client Situation

0



Client Challenge



JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser.

Trump Introduces New ICE Immigration Crackdown in Maine: Catch of the Day | Latest Donald Trump News

0

The administration of United States President Donald Trump has announced its latest immigration enforcement operation, this time in the northeastern state of Maine.

On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security confirmed that immigration raids had begun a day earlier, under the name “Operation Catch of the Day”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

In a statement, a Trump administration spokesperson appeared to signal that targeting Maine was a political response to the ongoing feud between the president and the state’s governor, Democrat Janet Mills.

“Governor Mills and her fellow sanctuary politicians in Maine have made it abundantly clear that they would rather stand with criminal illegal aliens than protect law-abiding American citizens,” said spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin.

But rumours have swirled that Maine was singled out for its significant Somali American population in the cities of Portland and Lewiston. Estimates put the total number of Somali Americans in the state at about 3,000.

Trump has repeatedly denounced the Somali community over the past several months, comparing its members to “garbage” at a December cabinet meeting. As recently as Tuesday, he used his White House podium to call Somalis and Somali Americans “ a lot of very low IQ people”.

Racist and anti-immigrant rhetoric has been a trademark of Trump’s campaigns for public office, and he has repeatedly singled out specific groups – including Haitians and Mexicans – to falsely tie their immigrant identity to pervasive criminal activity.

Mayor Mark Dion of Portland, Maine, speaks at a news conference on January 21 [Patrick Whittle/AP Photo]

Parallels with Minnesota

Trump’s focus on the Somali community comes after a handful of members were implicated in a fraud scandal in Minnesota, a midwestern state where immigration enforcement operations were launched in December.

Those efforts have been marked by violent clashes between federal agents and protesters, and one woman, 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good, was shot dead in her car after an interaction with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Fears that those tensions could spill into Maine dominated a Wednesday news conference with city officials in Portland.

Mayor Mark Dion told reporters that immigrant communities in the region felt “anxious and fearful” as ICE agents began their crackdown.

“They see this action as unpredictable and a threat to their families,” he explained.

He also questioned whether a heavy-handed operation was necessary to address immigration infractions in the area, and he called on ICE to adopt different tactics than it had in Minnesota.

“I want to underscore one important point: While we respect the law, we challenge the need for a paramilitary approach to the enforcement of federal statutes,” Dion said.

“Federal immigration law is lawful. Its administration and enforcement is lawful,” he added. “What we’ve been concerned with, as a council, is the enforcement tactics that ICE has undertaken in other communities, which to our mind appear to threaten and intimidate populations.”

Nevertheless, Dion expressed optimism that ICE would adopt a more tailored approach to apprehending local suspects.

While the city of Minneapolis, Minnesota, has seen nearly 2,000 immigration officers flood its streets, the mayor predicted that Maine would not see the same “massing of federal agents”.

“We’re seeing very individualised activity by ICE. A person here, a neighbourhood there,” he said. “Their conduct, at least as it is current in Maine, seems to be focused, which would indicate to me – and this is the speculation – that they’re functioning on the basis of an actual court warrant.”

That, he said, marked a departure from the “random, show-me-your-papers kind of experience” that residents had experienced in Minnesota.

A memorial for Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis
Well-wishers on January 20 visit a makeshift memorial for Renee Nicole Good, who was fatally shot by an ICE officer in Minneapolis [Angelina Katsanis/AP Photo]

Outrage at ICE operations

Still, while Dion advocated for a wait-and-see approach to the ICE operation, other city officials took a harder stance.

One Portland city councillor,  Wesley Pelletier, described the unfolding raids as part of “an agenda of white nationalism and might makes right”.

“This is a war of terror that’s being waged on our city by the federal government,” Pelletier said. “We’ve seen people of all ages getting thrown on the ground and getting thrown into trucks.”

So far, Fox News quoted ICE Deputy Assistant Director Patricia Hyde as saying the agency had made 50 arrests so far as part of operation “Catch of the Day”. Hyde added that ICE had identified nearly 1,400 individuals to detain in Maine.

Wednesday’s statement from the Department of Homeland Security highlighted four arrests as examples, showing people from Sudan, Guatemala, Ethiopia and Angola.

It described the four individuals as “the worst of the worst” and accused them of crimes ranging from aggravated assault to endangering the welfare of a child, though it was unclear in one case if the accusation had resulted in a conviction.

“We are no longer allowing criminal illegal aliens to terrorize American citizens,” McLaughlin said in the statement.

But Democratic officials in the state suggested that the Trump administration had refused to coordinate in the lead-up to “Catch of the Day”, heightening anxiety on the local level.

On January 14, nearly a week before the operation was launched, Governor Mills posted on social media that she had “attempted, unsuccessfully thus far, to confirm” the upcoming surge in federal immigration enforcement.

In a video statement, she said the state had reached out to local governments in Portland and Lewiston to prepare. She added that she too felt “angry” about the expected surge.

“Our goal, as always, will be to protect the safety and the rights of the people of Maine,” Mills said.

“To the federal government, I say this: If your plan is to come here to be provocative and to undermine the civil rights of Maine residents, do not be confused. Those tactics are not welcome here to the people of Maine.”

She also took a jab at the trend of federal agents using masks and other facial coverings to conceal their identities.

“Look, Maine knows what good law enforcement looks like because our law enforcement are held to high professional standards,” Mills said. “They are accountable to the law. And I’ll tell you this: They don’t wear a mask to shield their identities, and they don’t arrest people in order to fill a quota.”

Janet Mills
Democratic Governor Janet Mills has openly opposed Trump administration policies [File: Robert F Bukaty/AP Photo]

A political rivalry

Mills and Trump have long been political adversaries, with their feud erupting in a public forum. In February last year, shortly after Trump returned to office for a second term, he hosted a White House gathering for governors, where he called out Mills personally.

“Is Maine here? The governor of Maine?” Trump said while outlining policies barring transgender athletes from sporting events. “Are you not going to comply with it?”

“I’m complying with state and federal law,” Mills responded. The tension escalated from there.

“You’d better comply because otherwise you’re not getting any, any federal funding,” Trump shot back.

“See you in court,” Mills replied.

“Good. I’ll see you in court. I look forward to that. That should be a really easy one. And enjoy your life after, governor, because I don’t think you’ll be in elected politics,” he said.

The interaction made national news and cemented the frosty relationship between the two leaders, with Trump demanding an apology and slamming the Democratic governor for months afterwards.

His administration also took a series of escalating actions designed to target Mills, including launching an education probe in her state, suspending a marine research grant and freezing other federal funds to Maine.

In response to this week’s ICE deployment, Mills issued a short statement acknowledging the Trump administration’s latest efforts.

“Together, we will continue to place the safety and civil rights of Maine people above all else, and remain vigilant in our defense of due process and the rule of law,” she wrote.

Maine is set to hold its next gubernatorial race in 2026, as part of the year’s midterm election cycle.

Having served two terms as governor, Mills is not eligible for re-election and will instead be making a run for the US Senate, challenging Republican incumbent Susan Collins.

New England All-Region Teams for 2025

0

VIOLET CLOUGH
Rice Memorial High School (VT)
Junior – Midfield

22 goals, 12 assists
First Team All-Metro
Burlington Free Press Player of the Year
Burlington Free Press First Team All-State
NFHCA All-Northern New England Region First Team
MAXFH Preseason Player to Watch

Genes, not just lifestyle, contribute to the longevity of super-agers

0

Using the largest sample of super-agers to date, scientists have found convincing evidence that supports what many of us have suspected: Longevity isn’t just about healthy lifestyle choices, but also a good draw in the genetic lottery.

Researchers from Vanderbilt University Medical Center investigated what super-agers – people who enter their 80s with the cognitive function of those many decades younger – might have in common. And they found clear genetic evidence that their fundamental biology is playing a big part in living healthier for longer. This supports 2020 research that found the brains of super-agers actually look different, too.

The team used data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project Phenotype Harmonization Consortium, which included 18,080 participants from eight national aging cohorts. The scientists found that compared to people over 80 years with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), super-agers were 68% less likely to carry the Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 gene – or APOE-ε4 – the well-known AD-risk gene. What’s more, when compared to even healthy people in the same age bracket, super-agers were 19% less likely to have the APOE-ε4 gene.

But it’s not just about risk reduction, the researchers found. As well as having a much lower rate of carrying this problematic gene, super-agers had a much higher incidence of also having protective DNA, APOE-ε2. Compared to healthy people over 80 years, super-agers were 28% more likely to carry APOE-ε2 – and this jumped to 103% when measured against people with AD in the same age bracket. Essentially, they were twice as likely to have this protective gene.

“This was our most striking finding – although all adults who reach the age of 80 without receiving a diagnosis of clinical dementia exhibit exceptional aging, our study suggests that the super-ager phenotype can be used to identify a particularly exceptional group of oldest-old adults with a reduced genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease,” said Leslie Gaynor, assistant professor of Medicine in the Division of Geriatric Medicine, who co-led the study.

While “super-agers” is a catch-all term, it’s widely used to group together people who are 80 years or older with the cognitive function of healthy adults aged 50 to 64. For some time, scientists have been trying to work out just why these people defy the statistics when it comes to aging – and in turn tend to live healthily for longer.

“With interest in super agers growing, our findings notably encourage the view that the super-ager phenotype will prove useful in the continued search for mechanisms conferring resilience to AD,” Gaynor said.

“This is by far the largest study to date to identify differences in APOE-ε4 allele frequency based on super-ager status, and the first study to find a relationship between APOE-ε2 allele frequency and super-ager status,” she added. “We would expect these findings to lend continued interest to questions of how these variants may influence development of clinical dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease, as well as to the super-ager phenotype more generally.”

While observational, the study sheds light on the role genes may play in why a small subset of people remain cognitively sharp well into their 80s and beyond.

The study was published in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association.

Source: Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Africa CDC official announces ethical review of US-funded vaccine study in Guinea-Bissau

0

US-funded Guinea-Bissau vaccine study to undergo ethical review, Africa CDC official says

Trump announces progress on Greenland deal and drops tariffs threat

0

Bernd Debusmann JrWhite House reporter

Watch: The BBC’s Faisal Islam on how Trump’s Davos speech was received

President Donald Trump says the US has a potential deal on Greenland as he dropped plans to impose tariffs on European countries that had opposed his ambitions for America to acquire the island.

On social media, Trump said a “very productive meeting” with Nato’s leader had led to the “framework” of a potential agreement covering Greenland and the Arctic.

“This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all Nato Nations,” Trump posted.

Earlier on Wednesday, he told the World Economic Forum in Switzerland that he would not use military force but wanted immediate talks to secure ownership of the territory, which he says is vital for US national security.

On Truth Social on Wednesday, Trump said: “We have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region.”

Further information would be made available “as discussions progress”, he added.

The US president added that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff would “report directly” to him as negotiations continued.

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said in a statement: “The day is ending on a better note than it began.”

He added: “Now, let’s sit down and find out how we can address the American security concerns in the Arctic while respecting the red lines of the Kingdom of Denmark.”

In the hours that followed, some details trickled out.

Trump told CNBC the possible deal would last “forever” and could involve mineral rights and the planned Golden Dome missile defence system, which is envisioned as a shield of interceptors and detectors spanning land, sea and space to protect the US from long-range missile strikes.

Along with Greenland’s position on the globe, the Trump administration has spoken about its vast – and largely untapped – reserves of rare earth minerals, many of which are crucial for technologies including mobile phones and electric vehicles.

Ros Atkins on… Trump’s Davos speech claims

After the post, Trump told CNN in Davos that the deal framework for Greenland was “pretty far along” and “gets us everything we needed to get”, especially “real national security and international security”.

He did not say if the framework included American ownership of Greenland, though.

Trump had previously dismissed the idea of leasing Greenland, saying that “you defend ownership. You don’t defend leases.”

According to the New York Times, the plan would grant the US ownership of small pockets of the territory’s land, where American military bases could be built.

Officials who attended a Nato meeting about the matter on Wednesday told the newspaper the suggested arrangement would be similar to UK bases on Cyprus, which are part of British Overseas Territories.

Under existing agreements with Denmark, the US can bring as many troops as it wants to Greenland. It already has more than 100 military personnel permanently stationed at its Pituffik base in the north-western tip of the territory.

Nato spokeswoman Allison Hart said in a statement that during the meeting Trump and Rutte had “discussed the critical significance of security in the Arctic region to all Allies, including the United States”.

“Negotiations between Denmark, Greenland, and the United States will go forward aimed at ensuring that Russia and China never gain a foothold – economically or militarily – in Greenland,” she also said.

Watch: Trump takes aim at world leaders in Davos speech

Trump had said he was planning to place a 10% tariff “on any and all goods” sent from the UK to the US from 1 February, increasing to 25% from 1 June, until a deal was reached for Washington to purchase Greenland from Denmark.

The same would apply to goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Finland – all of which are members of Nato, the defence alliance founded in 1949.

In a speech to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Trump said he was “seeking immediate negotiations” to acquire Greenland, but insisted the US would not take the territory with force.

“We probably won’t get anything unless I decide to use excessive force. We’d be unstoppable, but we won’t do that,” Trump said. “I don’t have to use force. I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force.”

He also urged world leaders to allow the US to take control of Greenland from Denmark, saying: “You can say yes and we will be very appreciative. Or you can say no and we will remember.”

But Trump suggested he would not be receptive to any agreements on the US use of Greenland that fall short of full ownership.

In his own speech at Davos a day earlier, French President Emmanuel Macron criticised Trump’s previous threat of tariffs, saying an “endless accumulation of new tariffs” from the US was “fundamentally unacceptable”.

Macron was among those urging the EU to consider retaliatory options against new US levies.

In his speech, Trump took aim at Macron, saying France had been “screwing” the US for decades.

The US president also took a swipe at Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who urged “middle powers” such as Australia, Argentina and his own country to band together when he spoke at Davos a day earlier.

In response, the US president accused Carney of being ungrateful to the US.

“Canada lives because of the United States,” Trump said. “Remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements.”